Analyzing Behavioural Scenarios over Tabular Specifications Using Model Checking
نویسندگان
چکیده
Tabular notations, in particular SCR specifications, have proved to be a useful means for formally describing complex requirements. The SCR method offers a powerful family of analysis tools, known as the SCR Toolset, but its availability is restricted by the Naval Research Laboratory of the USA. This toolset applies different kinds of analysis considering the whole set of behaviours associated with a requirements specification. In this paper we present a tool for describing and analyzing SCR requirements descriptions, that complements the SCR Toolset in two aspects. First, its use is not limited by any institution, and resorts to a standard model checking tool for analysis; and second, it allows one to concentrate the analysis to particular sets of behaviours (subsets of the whole specifications), that correspond to particular scenarios explicitly mentioned in the specification. We take an operational notation that allows the engineer to describe behavioural “scenarios” by means of programs, and provide a translation into Promela to perform the analysis via Spin, an efficient off-the-shelf model checker freely available. In addition, we apply the SCR method to a Pacemaker system and we use its tabular specification as a running example of this article.
منابع مشابه
Applying infinite state model checking and other analysis techniques to tabular requirements specifications of safety-critical systems
Although it is most often applied to finite state models, in recent years, symbolic model checking has been extended to infinite state models using symbolic representations that encode infinite sets. This paper investigates the application of an infinite state symbolic model checker called Action Language Verifier (ALV) to formal requirements specifications of safety-critical systems represente...
متن کاملAnalyzing Tabular and State-Transition Requirements Specifications in PVS
\_' (lescribe PVS's capabilities for representing tabular specifications of the kind advocated t)y Parnas and others, and show how PVS's Type Correctness Conditions (TCCs) are used to ensure certain well-formedness properties. We then show how these and other capabilities of PVS can be used to represent the AND/OR tables of Leveson and the Decision Tables of Sherry, and we demonstrate how PVS_s...
متن کاملPrecise Documentation of Requirements and Executable Specifications
We propose a format for precise documentation of requirements to drive the development of dependable software products and to provide evidence for their certification. Requirements are elicited from customers and expressed informally as atomic English descriptions. To analyze the consistency of the requirements, we translate them into a software specification consisting of model contracts and t...
متن کاملUsing Abstraction and Model Checking to Detect Safety Violations in Requirements Specifications
Exposing inconsistencies can uncover many defects in software specifications. One approach to exposing inconsistencies analyzes two redundant specifications, one operational and the other property-based, and reports discrepancies. This paper describes a “practical” formal method, based on this approach and the SCR (Software Cost Reduction) tabular notation, that can expose inconsistencies in so...
متن کاملModel Checking Value-Passing Modal Specifications
Formal modelling and verification of variability concepts in product families has been the subject of extensive study in the literature on Software Product Lines. In recent years, we have laid the basis for the use of modal specifications and branching-time temporal logics for the specification and analysis of behavioural variability in product family definitions. A critical point in this forma...
متن کامل